Evaluation Of COCOMO Model Accuracy In Software Effort Estimation
-
Umar Jeklin
*
STMIK Widya Cipta Dharma,
Indonesia
- Muhammad Ibnu Saad STMIK WIdya Cipta Dharma, Indonesia
- Hanifah ekawati STMIK WIdya Cipta Dharma, Indonesia
Abstract
Accurate effort estimation underpins on-time,on-budget software delivery. This study empirically assesses the baseline Constructive cost Model (COCOMO) by applying standard organic-mode parameters (a = 2.4, b = 1.05) to the COCOMONASA dataset, which contains 63 NASA projects ranging from 2 KLOC to 100 KLOC. Model ourputs are benchmarked against recorded person-month effort using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMRE), and Predcitions at 25 percent error (PRED 0.25). Results show MAE values 295-661 person-months and an MMRE near 1.0, indicating average relative error of ~100 percent. PRED (0.25) equals 0.0, meaning no project is estimated within the industry-accepted 25% band. Sensitivity tests on 5- and 20-project subsets reveal similar patterns, confiriming that the inaccuracy is systemic rather than dataset-specific. Using uncalibrated COCOMO in present-day projects poses a high risk of severe under- or over allocation of resources, potentially trigerring budget overruns and schedule slips. By quantitatively exposing where and how the baseline model fails, this work provides a benchmark for and a roadmap toward-targeted parameter calibration and hybrid approaches that incorporate additional cost drivers or machine-learning techniques. Future research should explore automatic parameter tuning and context-aware hybrid models to achieve dependable effort estimation in contemporary software engineering.
References
Ahmad, M., & Wani, M. A. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Modern Software Effort Estimation Techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications, 175(3), 22-27.
Ahmed, M., Ibrahim, N. B., W., Ahmed, A., Juniadi, M.., Flores, E. S., & Anand, D. (2024). AHybrid Model for Improving Software Cost Estimation in Global Software Developemnt. Computers, Material & Continua, 78(1), 1399-1422. Httips://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2023.046648
Alenezi, M., & Mahmood, A. K. (2020). A Comparative Study of Software Effort Estimation Models. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(8), 1-6.
Beazley, D. (2020). Python Essential Reference (5th ed). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bisong, E. (2019). Building Machine Learning and Deep Learning Model on Google Cloud Platform. Berkeley, CA: Apress.
Boehm, B. W., Abts, C.,, & Chulani, S. (2020). Software cost estimation with COCOMO II. Prentice Hall.
Chollet, F. (2021). Deep Learning with Python (2nd ed.). Manning Publications
Geron, A. (2019). Hands-on Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow (3rd ed). Sebastopol, CA: Apress.
Guttag, J. V. (2021). Introduction to Computation and Programming Using Python (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jorgensen, M., & Shepperd, M (2019). A systematic review of software development cost estimation studies. IEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 45(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2017.2754298
Lutz, M. (2019). Learning Python (5th ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media
Mahmood, Y., et al. (2021). Software Effort Estimation Accuracy Prediction of Machine Learning Techniques: A Systematic Performance Evaluation. arXiv:2101.10658. [online]. https//arxiv.org/abs/2101.10658
McKinney, W. (2020). Python for Data Analysis (3rd ed.). Sebastopol CA:O’Reilly Media.
Pandey, S., & Brave, S. (2019). Software Effort Estimation Using Rao Algorithm. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 11(1), 16-24.
Pandey, S., Dubey, S. K., & Rana, A. (2021). Software effort estimation techniques: A systematic literature review. *Journal King Saud University – Computer and Information Scinces, 33*(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.03.007
Patton, M. Q. (2020). Utilization-Focused Evaluation (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Saga Publications.
Pressman, R. S., & Maxim, B. R. (2020). Software engineering: A practitioner approach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education
Rascha, S. & Mirjalili, V. (2020). Python Machine learning (3rd ed.). Packt Publishing
Raza, S. A., Qureshi, M. R. J., & Ahmad, F. (2022). Software Effort Estimation using Machine Learning Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 34(2), e2384.
Sommerville, I. (2020). Sofware engineering (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
Stufflebeam, D.L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2019). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Thakur, D., & Kaur, G. (2021). A Review of Software Effort Estimation Techniques.. International Journal of Scincetific & Technology Research, 10(1), 258-262.
Van Rossum, G. (2020). Python Programming Laguage. Python Software Foundation. https://www.python.org/
Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Hardt M., Recht, B., & Vinyals, O. (2020). Understanding deep learning (still) requires rethinking generalization. Communications of the-ACM, 64(3), 107-115. https//:doi.org/10.1145/3446776
Copyright (c) 2025 Umar Jeklin, Muhammad Ibnu Saad, Hanifah ekawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
.png)
.png)
