Evaluasi User Experience Pada Aplikasi Linkaja Menggunakan Metode User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ)

  • Reggy Ayunda Agustina Institut Teknologi Telkom Purwokerto, Indonesia
  • Muhamad Azrino Gustalika * Mail Institut Teknologi Telkom Purwokerto, Indonesia
Keywords: Fintech; User Experience; User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ); E-Wallet; LinkAja

Abstract

Rapid technological developments, increasingly complete with the presence of fintech. One of the developing fintech in Indonesia is E-Wallet. Several supporting applications for using E-Wallet include OVO, DANA, LinkAja, ShopeePay and GoPay. According to the results of research by the Daily Social, LinkAja is an E-Wallet that still has few users and has a low rating on the Google Play Store when compared to other E-Wallets. LinkAja users have submitted various complaints in the Google Play Store comments column. Apart from that, LinkAja users also felt other complaints, such as failed upgrades, inappropriate service, deducted balances, and so on. The complaints mentioned point to the quality of the system and services provided by LinkAja, while the high quality of the services provided affects the high level of user satisfaction. With various kinds of problems and complaints about LinkAja, it is necessary to evaluate the user experience so that LinkAja can improve the user experience. One model method for measuring user experience and will be used in this study is the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). This study succeeded in evaluating the LinkAja application using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). This study resulted in measurements of each aspect such as Attractiveness (1.552), Perspicuity (1.667), Efficiency (1.225), Dependability (1.233), Stimulation (0.958) obtained a positive evaluation value while Novelty (0.125) obtained a neutral evaluation value, and the benchmark results showed aspects of Attractiveness, Perspicuity, Efficiency, Dependability get the "Above Average" category, Stimulation gets the "Below Average" category, while the Novelty aspect gets the "Bad" category. It is necessary to make improvements in the aspects of Novelty and Stimulation

References

REFERENCES

M. Rizal, E. Maulina, and N. Kostini, “Fintech As One Of The Financing Solutions For SMEs,” vol. 3, no. 2, 2018.

M. R. Alsyukri, “Pengaruh Kemudahan, Gaya Hidup Dan Perilaku Konsumtif Terhadap Keputusan Penggunaan E-Wallet Selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” pp. 4–18, 2021.

E. S. Prima, “Skripsi Evaluasi User Experience Pada Aplikasi E-Wallet Dengan Metode User Experience Questionnaire,” 2021.

N. A. Rahayu and M. T. Lestari, “Pengaruh Customer Experience Terhadap Brand Image Pada Aplikasi LinkAja The Effect Of Customer Experience On Brand Image On LinkAja,” 2021.

Y. Aziati, “Analisis Pengaruh User Experience Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Mobile Application E-Commerce Shopee Menggunakan Model Delone & Mclean,” 2020, [Online]. Available: http://www.akrabjuara.com/index.php/akrabjuara/article/view/919.

N. K. R. Juniantari and nyoman T. . Putra, “Analisis Sistem Informasi DPMPTSP Menggunakan Metode User Experience Questionnaire,” J. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2021, doi: 10.33387/jiko.

I. N. S. W. Wijaya, P. P. Santika, I. B. A. I. Iswara, and I. N. A. Arsana, “Analisis dan Evaluasi Pengalaman Pengguna PaTik Bali dengan Metode User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ),” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 8, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.2020762763.

F. Fitranda, H. M. Az-zahra, and A. D. Herlambang, “Evaluasi User Experience pada Kahoot dan Socrative menggunakan Metode User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) (Studi pada SMKN 3 Malang),” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 10701–10704, 2019.

S. F. Novitasari, Y. T. Mursityo, and A. N. Rusydi, “Evaluasi Pengalaman Pengguna Pada E-Commerce Sociolla.Com Menggunakan Usability Testing Dan User Experience Questionnaire (Ueq),” J. Sist. Informasi, Teknol. Informasi, dan Edukasi Sist. Inf., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 57–63, 2020, doi: 10.25126/justsi.v1i2.9.

R. Dimas, B. Kurniawan, S. H. Wijoyo, and N. H. Wardani, “Evaluasi Usability Aplikasi MY JNE Dengan Metode User Experience Questionnaire ( UEQ ) Dan Heuristic Evaluation,” vol. 3, no. 6, 2019.

C. B. Romansya, H. M. Az-zahra, and R. I. Rokhmawati, “Evaluasi User Experience Aplikasi Perangkat Bergerak Ruang Guru dengan Metode Heuristic Evaluation,” vol. 3, no. 9, 2019.

A. G. Hartzani, “Evaluasi User Experience Pada Dompet Digital OVO Menggunakan User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ),” 2021.

R. nur Amalia, R. setia Dianingati, and E. Annisaa, “Pengaruh jumlah responden terhadap hasil uji validitas dan reliabilitas kuesioner pengetahuan dan perilaku swamedikasi,” Generics J. Res. Pharm., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 9–15, 2022.

T. Tugiman, H. Herman, and A. Yudhana, “Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Model Utaut Untuk Evaluasi Sistem Pendaftaran Online Rumah Sakit,” JATISI (Jurnal Tek. Inform. dan Sist. Informasi), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1621–1630, 2022, doi: 10.35957/jatisi.v9i2.2227.

R. Al Hakim, I. Mustika, and W. Yuliani, “Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Angket Motivasi Berprestasi,” FOKUS (Kajian Bimbing. Konseling dalam Pendidikan), vol. 4, no. 4, p. 263, 2021, doi: 10.22460/fokus.v4i4.7249.

P. R. Rindiasari, Hidayat, Yuliani, W. Hidayat, and W. Yuliani, “Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Angket Kepercayaan Diri,” FOKUS (Kajian Bimbing. Konseling dalam Pendidikan), vol. 4, no. 5, p. 367, 2021, doi: 10.22460/fokus.v4i5.7257.

M. Erida, “Uji Validitas dan Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen Motivasi Pengidap HIV/AIDS,” J. Ilm. Bina Edukasi, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10–21, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.umika.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_edukasi/article/view/156.

B. O. Lubis, A. Salim, and J. Jefi, “Evaluasi Usability Sistem Aplikasi Mobile JKN Menggunakan Use Questionnaire,” J. SAINTEKOM, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 65, 2020, doi: 10.33020/saintekom.v10i1.131.

Dimensions Badge
Published
2022-12-26
How to Cite
Ayunda Agustina, R., & Azrino Gustalika, M. (2022). Evaluasi User Experience Pada Aplikasi Linkaja Menggunakan Metode User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). Bulletin of Information Technology (BIT), 3(4), 323 - 331. https://doi.org/10.47065/bit.v3i4.401
Section
Articles