Implementasi Metode Aras Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Untuk Pemilihan Inseminator Terbaik

  • Ari Gunawan Rambe * Mail Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: Inseminators; ARAS Method; DSS

Abstract

The success of inseminator officers is largely determined by the synergy of the roles and functions of each work unit at the Puskeswan Kota Subulussalam, as well as the activities of technical officers in the field. The role of inseminator officers is one of the main factors in the success of the program as measured by pregnancy and birth rates. Puskeswan, namely the Animal Health Center which provides services in the field of animal health in Subulussalam. The problem that occurs at the Subulussalam Health Center every year is to select the best inseminators to increase the appreciation of the performance of the inseminators, in selecting the best inseminators. still less effective. To overcome this problem, the authors want to select the best inseminator by implementing a decision support system by applying the ARAS method because this method is used for ranking so that the problem is more focused because it is based on predetermined criteria and weight values ​​so that it will get maximum results and produce better decisions. accurate in selecting the best inseminator at the Subulussalam Health Center

References

M. A. Hasmi, M. Mesran, and B. Nadeak, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Instruktur Fitness Menerapkan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (Aras) (Studi Kasus : Vizta Gym Medan),” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 121–129, 2018.

E. D. Kusumawati and H. Leondro, “Inseminasi buatan 1.”

A. S. Nadeak, “Penerapan Metode Aras ( Additive Ratio Assessment ) Dalam Penilaian Guru Terbaik,” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Komput. Sains, vol. 2, no. 2010, pp. 571–578, 2019.

U. I. Gorontalo, “Metode Aras,” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2019.

L. Handayani, M. Syahrizal, and K. Tampubolon, “Pemilihan Kepling Teladan Menerapkan Metode Rank Order Centroid (Roc) Dan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (Aras) Di Kecamatan Medan Area,” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 532–538, 2019.

Kusrini, Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. 2007.

T. Limbong et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode & Implementasi. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.

R. Addenan and W. Susanti, “Penerapan Metode Rank Order Centroid dan Additive Ratio Assessment Pada Aplikasi Rekomendasi Supplier,” Edumatic J. Pendidik. Inform., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2021.

S. Dharma Hardi et al., “Implementation of Computer Based Systems for Effective Deci-sions in Acceptance of Vikar,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 101–104, 2018.

L. C. L. Gaol and N. A. Hasibuan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Team Leader Shift Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Metode Aras Studi Kasus Pt. Anugrah Busana Indah,” Inf. dan Teknol. Ilm., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 101–106, 2018.

E. K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, “A new additive ratio assessment ( ARAS ) method in multicriteria decision ‐ making,” vol. 8619, 2011.

J. Afriany, “Penerapan Metode ARAS Guna Mendukung Keputusan Produk Unggulan Daerah,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 441–447, 2019.

H. Syahputra, M. Syahrizal, S. Suginam, S. D. Nasution, and B. Purba, “SPK Pemilihan Konten Youtube Layak Tonton Untuk Anak-Anak Menerapkan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Komput. Sains, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 678–685, 2019.

Dimensions Badge
Published
2022-11-30
Section
Articles