Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Smartphone Kelas Midrange 2023 dengan Menggunakan Metode MAUT

  • Afri Nirmalasari Halawa Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
  • Helfrida Hotmaria Sihite Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Syahrizal * Mail Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: Decision Support System; MAUT Method; Middle Class HP; DSS

Abstract

Smart phones (HP) have become a basic need for society in various aspects of life, from communication, entertainment, information, to work. There are various kinds of cellphones on the market, with various features and specifications offered. The price of cellphones is getting more and more expensive, so consumers' needs for using cellphones are also different. Midrange cellphones are suitable for users who want a cellphone with fairly good specifications, but at a relatively affordable price. Midrange is a category of cellphone that is between the entry-level and high-end categories. Midrange cellphones usually have better specifications than entry-level cellphones, but are not as expensive as high-end cellphones. Therefore, an appropriate midrange class cellphone selection process is needed for people to get a cellphone that suits their needs at an affordable price. In the selection process for midrange class cellphones, a decision-making technique known as SPK (Decision Support System) is required. In this research, the MAUT method is used for the midrange class HP selection process. The level of importance of each criterion is determined by the researcher himself. The final result obtained is that the A5 is the highest midrange class cellphone with a final value (Ui) of 0.865. The second ranked alternative is A13 with a final value (Ui) of 0.857 and the third ranked alternative is A17 with a final value (Ui) of 0.657.

References

N. P. Rizanti, L. T. Sianturi, and M. Sianturi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Pertukaran Pelajar Menggunakan Metode PSI (Preference Selection Index),” in Seminar Nasional Teknologi Komputer & Sains (SAINTEKS), 2019, vol. 1, no. 1.

S. Damanik and D. P. Utomo, “Implementasi Metode ROC (Rank Order Centroid) Dan Waspas Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kerjasama Vendor,” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 4, no. 1, 2020.

J. Afriany, K. Tampubolon, and R. Fadillah, “Penerapan Metode TOPSIS Penentuan Pemberian Mikro Faedah Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI),” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 129–137, 2021.

T. A. Sundara, I. Stephane, and M. Fadli, “SPK Penilihan Guru Terbaik Dengan Metode WP Pada MAN 1 Pariaman,” J. Inform., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 310–321, 2019.

A. Triayudi and J. D. Rajagukguk, “Implementasi Metode MAUT Dalam Menentukan Prioritas Produk Unggulan Daerah Dengan Menerapkan Pembobotan ROC,” vol. 3, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v3i4.2216.

M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode MAUT Dalam Rekrutmen Kepala Gudang di Perusahaan Dengan Pembobotan ROC,” vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1073–1079, 2023, doi: 10.30865/klik.v4i2.1323.

A. Purwanto, E. Prasetyaningrum, R. Pratama, and M. Haspianto, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Dalam Pemilihan Handphone Untuk Kebutuhan Mahasiswa”.

R. Fadillah, A. N. Purnama, W. P. Mahardika, and M. Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Siaran Edukasi di Televisi Menggunakan Metode WASPAS (Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assesment),” JIKTEKS J. Ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 8–16, 2023.

M. Yanto, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Ahp Dalam Seleksi Produk,” J. Teknol. Dan Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 167–174, 2021.

D. O. Wibowo and A. T. Priandika, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Gedung Pernikahan Pada Wilayah Bandar Lampung Menggunakan Metode Topsis,” J. Inform. Dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 73–84, 2021.

D. P. Tarigan, A. Wantoro, and S. Setiawansyah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Kredit Mobil Dengan Fuzzy Tsukamoto (Studi Kasus: Pt Clipan Finance),” TELEFORTECH J. Telemat. Inf. Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 32–37, 2020.

D. Aldo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Dengan Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( Maut ),” Jursima, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 76, 2019, doi: 10.47024/js.v7i2.180.

N. Rivaldy, D. Irmayanti, and M. Defriani, “Perancangan SPK Kelayakan Pinjaman Koperasi Karyawan Perum Jasa Tirta Karya Bhakti Raharja dengan Metode MAUT,” J-SAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komput. dan Inform., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 172–181, 2023.

J. Faran and R. T. Aldisa, “Implementasi Metode MAUT dengan Menerapkan Pembobotan ROC Dalam Pemilihan Ketua Himpunan Mahasiswa,” J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1315–1322, 2023.

P. Pristiwanto, H. Sunandar, and B. Nadeak, “Penerapan Metode MAUT Terhadap Perkembangan Metaverse Untuk Media Pembelajaran Daring Dengan Pembobotan ROC,” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 100–107, 2023.

R. W. Dari, S. Sapriadi, N. A. Rahmi, and P. A. W. Purnama, “Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mobil Bekas,” J. KomtekInfo, pp. 73–79, 2023.

K. D. Putri, A. P. Juledi, and I. R. Munthe, “Perancangan Aplikasi SPK Penerimaaan Tenaga Kerja Honorer dengan Menggunakan Metode MAUT,” MEANS (Media Inf. Anal. dan Sist., pp. 48–56, 2023.

Dimensions Badge
Published
2024-03-16
Section
Articles