Analisis Proses Penagihan Piutang atas Transaksi Angkutan Non-Semen “Terpal” PT Semen Indonesia Logistik

  • Kholifatun Nur Handini Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Vicky Vendy * Mail Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Keywords: Account Receivable; Accounts Receivable Collection Procedures; Non-Cement “Tarpaulin” Transportation Transactions; PT Semen Indonesia Logistik; Receivables Collection Constraints

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze the procedures for accounts receivable collection and the handling of problematic receivables in the Non-Cement “Tarpaulin” transportation services at PT Semen Indonesia Logistik (SILOG), as well as to examine the obstacles that may hinder the receivables collection process within the company. The research adopts a case study method with a qualitative approach. Data collection techniques used in this study include interviews with three relevant informants, direct observations, and documentation analysis. The findings reveal that the receivables collection process begins with the delivery of billing documents, including invoices and supporting documents, and ends with the settlement of receivables through the SAP system. Receivables that become due are classified into four aging categories: 60 days, 120 days, 180 days, and 365 days. The collection of overdue receivables is carried out through communication via WhatsApp and, in some cases, direct visits to customers. Common obstacles encountered in the receivables collection process include difficulties in coordinating with customers, receivables that are difficult to collect due to customer insolvency or bankruptcy, and unidentifiable receivables or incoming payments. This research is expected to help the company evaluate its current receivables collection procedures more comprehensively. By identifying potential problems early, the company can make necessary improvements and develop more effective strategies for managing the receivables collection process

References

F. Jitmau, C. S. Marpaung, and V. F. B. Bura, “Analisis Penagihan Piutang pada CV. Pasir Raya Sorong,” Jurnal Pitis AKP, vol. 5, no. 1, Jun. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.32531/jakp.v5i1.503.

R. Prayoga, N. Muktiadji, A. Roup, and Iriyadi, “Implementasi Sistem Penagihan Piutang Jasa Body Repair Pada PT. Setiajaya Toyota Body And Paint Depok,” Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis Kesatuan, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 149–160, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.37641/jabkes.v4i1.1931.

Mulyadi, Sistem Akuntansi, 4th ed. Salemba Empat, 2016.

F. Prayoga and R. Pancasilawan, “Analisis Penagihan Piutang pada Perum Perumnas Proyek Bandung II,” JURNAL LENTERA BISNIS, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 639–646, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.34127/jrlab.v14i1.1371.

D. Sunyoto, Dasar-dasar Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan. CAPS, 2013.

A. S. Zahirah and V. Vendy, “Efektivitas Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dalam Sistem Penagihan Mega Distributor di PT Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk,” JURNAL MANEKSI, vol. 13, no. 4, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.31959/jm.v13i4.2515.

D. P. Ajie, I. N. Latif, and Sukirman, “Analisis Efektivitas Penagihan Piutang Di (PERUMDAM) Tirta Kencana Samarinda,” JMA: JURNAL MANAJEMEN DAN AKUNTANSI, vol. 11, no. 2, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31293/ekm.v11i2.6345.

R. Rudeng, “Jurnal Inovasi Akuntansi Modern Peranan Pengendalian Intern Terhadap Sistem Dan Prosedur Penagihan Piutang (Studi Kasus PT Malindo Feedmill Tbk Di Gresik),” Jurnal Inovasi Akuntansi Modern, vol. 7, no. 1, Feb. 2025.

S. M. R. Mano and T. Wasesa, “Prosedur Penagihan Piutang pada Anugrah Jaya Motor Surabaya,” Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 38–49, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.30640/abdimas45.v3i2.3107.

N. M. Puspayani and I. W. Suarjana, “Analisis Pengendalian dan Penagihan Piutang Departemen Akuntansi The Bandha Hotel & Suites,” Seminar Ilmiah Nasional Teknologi, Sains, dan Sosial Humaniora (SINTESA), vol. 7, Jan. 2025.

S. W. Noorusyiam, D. T. A. Tyas, and M. F. Hidayatullah, “Analisis Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Terhadap Prosedur Penagihan Piutang Customer PT. Violet Indonesia,” Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi (JEMBA), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85–94, Mar. 2024.

R. Widowati, R. Estiana, and Y. W. Syaputra, “Analisis Proses Penagihan Piutang Pelanggan di PT Tangkas Cipta Optimal, Jakarta,” Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis, vol. 7, no. 2, 2022, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.47686/jab.v7i02.444.

I. Hafsiah Yakin, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Garut: CV Aksara Global Akademia, 2023.

A. Susanty et al., Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Future Science Publisher, 2023.

M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis_ A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Sage Publication, Inc, 2014.

Dimensions Badge
Published
2026-01-13
How to Cite
Nur Handini, K. and Vendy, V. (2026) “Analisis Proses Penagihan Piutang atas Transaksi Angkutan Non-Semen ‘Terpal’ PT Semen Indonesia Logistik”, Jurnal Akutansi Manajemen Ekonomi Kewirausahaan (JAMEK), 6(1), pp. 43-52. doi: 10.47065/jamek.v6i1.2240.