Tax Amnesty : Kajian Program Amnesti Pajak Indonesia

  • Harun Ongah Politeknik Cendana, Indonesia
Keywords: Tax Amnesty; Policy Amnesty Program; Indonesian tax

Abstract

Tax is one of a country’s income which is used to improve the citizen’s prosperity. However, tax evasion has been rampant and could reduce tax income and eventually harming the country’s economy. Consequently, the government of the Republic of Indonesia has organized several tax amnesty programs to allow taxpayers to report their hidden asset without being punished. This article aimed to review all the tax amnesty policy that has been conducted in Indonesia thus far. This article also delved into other countries tax amnesty programs to allow the understanding of the short-term and long-term possible effects which may occur. Although the 1964 and 1984 tax amnesty program were deemed fail, the 2016-2017 tax amnesty and the voluntary recognition program in 2022 managed to boost the country’s short-term tax income. The 2016-2017 program even breaks the world record for the number of taxes collected from a single tax amnesty program. Nevertheless, the long-term effect, such as the decline in taxpayer’s compliance and the country’s economy must be considered. Unfairness towards compliant taxpayers must also be considered as it may reduce compliance in future payment. Future tax amnesty program, especially the one that is planned to be conducted in 2025, must be consider the possible negative aspect as well as other countries experience with tax amnesty.

References

Pramudito, “What is the Problem with Tax Collection in Indonesia?,” Indonesia Investment, Jakarta, pp. 1–1, Oct. 10, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.indonesia-investments.com/finance/financial-columns/what-is-the-problem-with-tax-collection-in-indonesia/item6023

R. Indonesia, Ubdang-undang RI No. 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Harmonisai Peraturan Pajak. Republik Indonesia, 2021, p. 224.

M. M. Erdoǧdu and S. Akar, “Behavioral Aspects of Tax Amnesties and Their Effects in Twelve Countries,” Public Finan. Q., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 270–287, 2022, doi: 10.35551/PFQ_2022_2_7.

W. Leenders et al., “OFFSHORE TAX EVASION AND WEALTH INEQUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM A TAX AMNESTY IN THE NETHERLANDS Offshore Tax Evasion and Wealth Inequality: Evidence from a Tax Amnesty in the Netherlands * Netherlands and the Tax and Customs Administration for access to the microdata (Project 8366) and discussions,” 2020, [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3723731

A. Hajawiyah, T. Suryarini, Kiswanto, and T. Tarmudji, “Analysis of a tax amnesty’s effectiveness in Indonesia,” J. Int. Accounting, Audit. Tax., vol. 44, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2021.100415.

Arrijal Rachman, “DPR Bahas Tax Amnesty Jilid III Mulai Januari 2025, Ini Bocorannya,” CNBC Indonesia, Jakarta, pp. 1–1, Nov. 30, 2024.

M. Nazir, Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2014.

Fiki Ariyanti, “Resmi Berakhir di 31 Maret, Ini Hasil Tax Amnesty,” Liputan6.com, Jakrta, pp. 1–1, Apr. 01, 2017.

Anisa Sopiah, “Sri Mulyani Cs Kantongi Rp 61 T dari ’Tax Amnesty Jilid II,” CNBC Indonesia, Jakarta, pp. 1–1, Dec. 29, 2022.

Erlina F. Santika, “Menilik Perbandingan Hasil Tax Amnesty Jilid I dan II,” Katadata Media Network, Jakarta, pp. 1–1, Nov. 20, 2024.

U. Hasanah, K. Na’im, E. Elyani, and K. Waruwu, “Analisis Perbandingan Tax Amnesty Jilid I dan Jilid II (Program Pengungkapan Sukarela) Serta Peluang Keberhasilannya,” Owner, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 706–716, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.33395/owner.v5i2.565.

Tabita Diela, “Indonesia’s Tax Amnesty Program Breaks World Record,” Jakartaglobe.id, Jakarta, pp. 1–1, Jul. 22, 2016.

Ni Luh Anggela, “Serupa Tapi Tak Sama, Ini Beda Tax Amnesty dan PPS,” Bisnis.com, Jakarta, pp. 1–1, Mar. 22, 2022.

Edy Gunawan, “Keadilan Bagi Wajib Pajak yang Patuh Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pengampunan Pajak,” Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 19, pp. 142–169, Nov. 2019.

M. Amin and A. Machmud, “Implementasi dan Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Pengampunan Pajak Dan Program Pengungkapan Sukarela,” vol. 6, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.

Word Bank Group, “Tax revenue (% of GDP),” Word Bank Group.

S. V. Junpath, M. S. E. Kharwa, and L. J. Stainbank, “Taxpayers’ attitudes towards tax amnesties and compliance in South Africa: an exploratory study,” South African J. Account. Res., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 97–119, 2016, doi: 10.1080/10291954.2015.1070565.

L. Uchitelle, “Economic Scene; Business Subdued In Tax Debate,” New York Times, New York, p. 1, Feb. 15, 1989.

J. López-Laborda and F. Rodrigo, “Tax amnesties and income tax compliance: The case of Spain,” Fisc. Stud., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 73–96, 2003, doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2003.tb00077.x.

M. A. Sanchez Villalba, “On the effects of repeated tax amnesties,” 2017. [Online]. Available: www.kspjournals.org

A. Alstadsaeter Niels Johannesen Gabriel Zucman et al., “NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES TAX EVASION AND INEQUALITY,” 2017. [Online]. Available: http://gabriel-zucman.eu/leaks.

K. Baer and E. Le Borgne, Tax amnesties : theory, trends, and some alternatives. International Monetary Fund ; Eurospan [distributor], 2009.

J. Slemrod, “Tax Compliance And Enforcement” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.nber.org/papers/w24799

Dimensions Badge
Published
2024-09-30
How to Cite
Harun Ongah (2024) “Tax Amnesty : Kajian Program Amnesti Pajak Indonesia”, Jurnal Akutansi Manajemen Ekonomi Kewirausahaan (JAMEK), 4(3), pp. 402-406. doi: 10.47065/jamek.v4i3.1798.