Implementasi Naive Bayes untuk Mengklasifikasi Pembelajaran Inovatif Terhadap Motivasi Belajar

  • Damar Firdaus Teknik Informatika, Institut Teknologi Pagar Alam, Pagar Alam, Indonesia
  • Efan * Mail Teknik Informatika, Institut Teknologi Pagar Alam, Pagar Alam, Indonesia
  • Yadi Teknik Informatika, Institut Teknologi Pagar Alam, Pagar Alam, Indonesia
Keywords: Classification; Crisp-Dm; Innovative Learning; Learning Motivation; Naive Bayes

Abstract

Learning motivation is a key factor in determining students' success in the educational process. Innovative learning methods are believed to increase motivation through interactive and engaging approaches. However, identifying the level of student motivation based on learning activities still becomes a challenge. This study aims to classify the influence of innovative learning on student motivation using the Naïve Bayes algorithm. The research method applies the CRISP-DM framework, which consists of business understanding, data understanding, data preparation, modeling, evaluation, and deployment. Data were collected through observation, interviews, questionnaires, and literature studies conducted at MTS Guppi Pagar Alam. The dataset consists of 70 students with attributes including teaching methods, learning media, classroom interaction, task creativity, and learning independence. The classification process divides data into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets. The results show that the Naïve Bayes model achieves an accuracy of 87%, indicating that the algorithm performs effectively in classifying student motivation levels. The findings reveal that classroom interaction and task creativity significantly influence learning motivation. This study contributes to providing insights for educators in designing more effective and adaptive learning strategies.

References

M. T. Agustina and D. A. Kurniawan, “Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa di Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” pp. 120–128.

R. Disriani and M. Habibi, “Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Hubungan Motivasi Belajar Siswa terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik. Vol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 125–131, 2023.

E. P. Rubiana, “Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi motivasi belajar ipa siswa smp berbasis pesantren 1,” vol. VIII, no. 2, pp. 12–17, 2020.

M. Purba and I. R. Padya, “ANALISIS SENTIMEN MARKETPLACE DI ERA SOCIETY 5 . 0 MENGGUNAKAN ALGORITMA NAIVE BAYES,” vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 16–23, 2023.

F. Z. Milla, A. N. A. Nabilah, and B. K. Aji, “Optimasi Strategi Pembelajaran Mahasiswa untuk Meningkatkan Efektivitas Pemilihan Metode Belajar melalui Pendekatan J48 Tree,” no. November, pp. 101–114, 2023.

B. V. Christioko, K. Khoirudin, and A. Nugroho, “Penentuan Pola Asosiatif Data Tracer Study Universitas Semarang dengan Algoritma Hash Based,” Aiti, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 150–166, 2023, doi: 10.24246/aiti.v20i2.150-166.

K. F. Irnanda, D. Hartama, and A. P. Windarto, “Analisa Klasifikasi C4.5 Terhadap Faktor Penyebab Menurunnya Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Masa Pandemi,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 327, 2021, doi: 10.30865/mib.v5i1.2763.

A. P. Wibawa, M. Guntur, A. Purnama, M. F. Akbar, and F. A. Dwiyanto, “Metode-metode Klasifikasi,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 134–138, 2018.

A. Bengueddach, L. Benachenhou, A. Bekkaye, and Efan, “Enhancing Content Recommendation for Programming Education Using BERT-Based Techniques.” doi: 10.4018/979-8-3373-0735-0.ch008.

F. Febriansyah, “Implementasi Metode Naive Bayes untuk Klasifikasi Kondisi Gizi Balita,” J. Inform. Univ. Pamulang, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 61–70, 2024, doi: 10.32493/informatika.v9i2.39676.

H. K, S. Tayal, P. M. George, P. Singla, and U. Kose, Bayesian Reasoning and Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning Applications. 2022. doi: 10.1201/9781003164265.

T. Susanto and M. Muntahanah, “Penerapan Algoritma Naive Bayes Pada Aplikasi Penelusuran Alumni (Tracer Study) Bagi Tamatan Smkn 2 Kota Bengkulu,” J. Inform. Upgris, vol. 8, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.26877/jiu.v8i2.13051.

P. P. D. B, “Implementasi Data Mining Klasifikasi Gejala Penyakit TB Menggunakan Algoritma Naive Bayes pada Studi Kasus,” vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2888–2898, 2024.

N. Sundari et al., “Strategi Pembelajaran Heuristik K-R dan Motivasi Belajar : Dampaknya Terhadap Kemampuan Representasi Matematis K-R Heuristic Learning Strategy and Learning Motivation : Impact on Mathematical Representation Ability matematika dibutuhkan untuk memahami strategi ini memberikan kesempatan bagi peserta didik untuk menyalurkan,” vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 1–8, 2022.

M. Kusmira, “Komparasi Algoritma Naive Bayes dan Support Vector Machine Untuk Memprediksi Pengaruh Pembelajaran Daring Terhadap Motivasi Belajar,” vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 100–107, 2021, doi: 10.30998/faktorexacta.v14i3.10325.

M. P. Hasibuan, R. Azmi, D. B. Arjuna, S. U. Rahayu, U. Islam, and N. Sumatera, “Analisis Pengukuran Temperatur Udara Dengan Metode Observasi,” vol. 1, 2023.

A. Ali, “METODE PENGUMPULAN DATA PENELITIAN MUSIK BERBASIS OBSERVASI AUDITIF,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 85–93, 2020.

J. Teoretis, T. Bidang, and R. Sipil, “u r n a lT e o r e t i s d a n e r a p a n i d a n g e k a y a s a i p i l Jurnal,” vol. 27, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.5614/jts.2020.27.3.10.

J. Pendidikan, P. Tematik, D. Masa, P. Covid-, and S. D. Pahlawan, “Analisis Kesiapan Guru Kelas Dalam Mengimplementasikan,” vol. 3, 2021.

A. F. Muchlis, “Metode Penelitian Survei-Kuesioner untuk Kesesakan dan Privasi pada Hunian Asrama Questionnaire and Survey for Crowding and Privacy in College Dorms : Research Methods,” vol. 12, no. September, pp. 154–163, 2023.

L. Tahmidaten and W. Krismanto, “Permasalahan Budaya Membaca di Indonesia ( Studi Pustaka Tentang Problematika & Solusinya ),” pp. 22–33, 2018.

D. A. Suhada, “Trend Penerapan Sistem Pakar : Sebuah Studi Literatur Trends In The Aplication Of Expert Systems : A Literature Study,” vol. x, no. x, pp. 12–18, 2023.

M. A. Hasanah, S. Soim, and A. S. Handayani, “Implementasi CRISP-DM Model Menggunakan Metode Decision Tree dengan Algoritma CART untuk Prediksi Curah Hujan Berpotensi Banjir,” J. Appl. Informatics Comput., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 103–108, 2021, doi: 10.30871/jaic.v5i2.3200.

E. Purwaningsih and E. Nurelasari, “Implementasi Metode K-Means Clustering Dengan Davies Bouldin Index Pada Analisis Faktor Penyebab Perceraian,” Inf. Manag. Educ. Prof., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 134–143, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/

I. Budiman, T. Prahasto, and Y. Christyono, “DATA CLUSTERING MENGGUNAKAN METODOLOGI CRISP-DM UNTUK PENGENALAN POLA PROPORSI PELAKSANAAN TRIDHARMA,” vol. 2012, no. Snati, pp. 15–16, 2012.

Dimensions Badge
Published
2026-07-30
Section
Articles