Pengaruh Risiko Spesifik Bank dan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Stabilitas Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah
- Muhamad Fakhrudin Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten, Indonesia
-
Ahmad Fatoni
*
Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten,
Indonesia
Abstract
This research aims to examine the influence of specific bank risks and Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on the stability of Sharia rural banks in the Province of Banten. The indicators of specific bank risks include Non-Performing Financing (NPF), Operational Cost to Operating Income (BOPO), and Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). Meanwhile, the indicators used to assess GCG are the size of the Sharia Supervisory Board (DPS), board of commissioners, and board of directors. This study uses panel data from 8 Sharia rural banks as research samples from June 2020 to June 2022. Based on the regression results using the selected model, which is the Common Effect Model, it was found that partially, the variables CAR, BOPO, and the board of directors have a significant influence on the stability of Sharia rural banks. Meanwhile, simultaneously, all the variables, namely NPF, CAR, BOPO, DPS, board of commissioners, and board of directors, collectively influence the stability of Sharia rural banks in the Province of Banten.
References
Aisyah, S., & Hosen, M. N. (2018). Total Factor Productivity and Efficiency Analysis on Islamic Banks in Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 22(1), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v22i1.1333
Ascarya, A., & Achsani, N. A. (2008). PERILAKU PERMINTAAN UANG DALAM SISTEM MONETER GANDA DI. September. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v11i1.235
Berger, A. N. (2019). Liquidity creation performance and financial stability consequences of Islamic banking: Evidence from a multinational study. Journal of Financial Stability, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2019.100692
Bukair, A. A., & Abdul Rahman, A. (2015). Bank performance and board of directors attributes by Islamic banks. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 8(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-10-2013-0111
Chai, Z., Sadiq, M. N., Ali, N., Malik, M., & Hamid, S. A. R. (2022). Bank Specific Risks and Financial Stability Nexus: Evidence From Pakistan. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(June), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.909141
Čihák, M., & Hesse, H. (2010). Islamic banks and financial stability: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-010-0089-0
Djebali, N., & Zaghdoudi, K. (2020). Testing the governance-performance relationship for the Tunisian banks: a GMM in system analysis. Financial Innovation, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-020-00182-5
Fatoni, A., & Sidiq, S. (2019). Analisis perbandingan stabilitas sistem perbankan syariah dan konvensional di indonesia. 11(2). https://doi.org/10.35313/ekspansi.v11i2.1350
Firmansyah, I. (2015). Determinant of Non Performing Loan: the Case of Islamic Bank in Indonesia. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 17(2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v17i2.51
Hasan, M., & Dridi, J. (2011). The Effects of the Global Crisis on Islamic and Conventional Banks: a Comparative Study. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 02(02), 163–200. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793993311000270
Hosen, M. N., & Rahmawati, R. (2016). Efficiency and Profitability in The Indonesian Islamic Banking Industry. Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah, 8(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v8i1.2507
Islam, M. U., & Kozokov, S. (2013). Stability of Islamic and Conventional banks, an empirical comparative analysis. Lund University, 12(3), 7–20.
Kabir Hassan, M., Unsal, O., & Emre Tamer, H. (2016). Risk management and capital adequacy in Turkish participation and conventional banks: A comparative stress testing analysis. Borsa Istanbul Review, 16(2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2016.04.001
Kapoor, N., & Goel, S. (2019). Do diligent independent directors restrain earnings management practices? Indian lessons for the global world. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 4(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-10-2018-0039
Koetter, M., & Porath, D. (2021). Efficient, Profitable and Safe Banking: An Oxymoron? Evidence from a Panel VAR Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal, 02. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2793987
Lassoued, M. (2018). Corporate governance and financial stability in Islamic banking. Managerial Finance, 44(5), 524–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-12-2016-0370 Corporate
Majdina, N., Munandar, J. M., & Effendi, J. (2019). The determinant factors of efficiency on Islamic banking and conventional banking in Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 23(3), 454–468. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v23i3.3157
Miah, M. D., & Uddin, H. (2017). Efficiency and stability: A comparative study between islamic and conventional banks in GCC countries. Future Business Journal, 3(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2017.11.001
Nugraheni, P., & Muhammad, R. (2019). Board of directors and credit risk: An empirical study of Indonesian Islamic banks. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 23(4), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v23i4.3484
Octavio, D. Q., & Soesetio, Y. (2019). Intellectual capital and bank profitability: Evidence from conventional and Islamic bank in Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 23(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v23i2.3028
Permatasari Husa, P., & Trinarningsih, W. (2015). Credit Risk in Indonesia: Islamic Bank vs Conventional Bank. Fokus Manajerial, 13(1), 53–60.
Rajhi, W., & Hassairi, S. A. (2012). Islamic Banks and Financial Stability: A Comparative Empirical Analysis between MENA and Southeast Asian Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2010126
Risfandy, T. (2018). Equity Financing and Islamic Banks’ Profitability: Evidence from the Biggest Muslim Country. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 22(3), 496–505. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v22i3.2150
Schaeck, K., & Cih, M. (2014). Competition , Efficiency , and Stability. 215–241.
Setyawati, I., Suroso, S., Suryanto, T., & Nurjannah, D. S. (2017). Does financial performance of Islamic banking is better? Panel data estimation. European Research Studies Journal, 20(2), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/661
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2020). Unstable Banking. National Bureau Of Economic Research, 4(3), 248–253. https://medium.com/@arifwicaksanaa/pengertian-use-case-a7e576e1b6bf%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100642
Simorangkir, I. (2014). Pengantar Kebanksentralan: Teori dan Praktik di Indonesia (1st ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Sriyana, J. (2015). Islamic banks’ profitability amid the competitive financing in Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 13(4), 1695–1710.
Tan, Y., & Floros, C. (2012). Bank profitability and inflation: The case of China. Journal of Economic Studies, 39(6), 675–696. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443581211274610
Wahid, M. A., & Dar, H. (2016). Stability of Islamic versus Conventional Banks: A Malaysian Case. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 50(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2016-5001-09
Zaghdoudi, K. (2019). The effects of risks on the stability of Tunisian conventional banks. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 9(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2019.93.389.401
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhamad Fakhrudin, Ahmad Fatoni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
