Determinan Pengungkapan Kebijakan Anti Korupsi Ditinjau dari Good Corporate Governance dan Reputasi Auditor
Abstract
Corruption is a major challenge as well as a problem in an organization or business. Economic development will weaken and corporate accountability will be lost due to corruption. As a result of corruption, it will have a negative impact in various fields, including on the country's economy. For this reason, company awareness is needed in disclosing anti-corruption policies as a form of minimizing the occurrence of corruption in the business world. Even the Indonesian Financial Services Authority (OJK) also explains the recommendations for disclosing anti-corruption policies to every company that goes public in its annual report. The internal control mechanism can be a key factor in fostering information disclosure so that it will reduce the potential for loopholes for acts of fraud. Good Corporate Governance (GCG) is intended as a tool that minimizes fraud. In addition, by using a reputable public accounting firm, it is hoped that it can also show a more convincing and quality reputation and will be more motivated to disclose information, especially related to efforts to prevent corruption. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (board of directors size, board of commissioners' independence, audit committee meeting frequency, and governance committee) and auditor's reputation on anti-corruption policy disclosure. This research uses all companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the 2019-2021 period using a purposive sampling method. From 1739 companies, the results obtained were that the independence of the board of commissioners, governance committee, and auditor reputation had a positive effect on disclosing anti-corruption policies. Meanwhile, the size of the board of directors and the frequency of audit committee meetings have no effect on anti-corruption policies.
References
Aclc.kpk.go.id. (2020). Dampak Korupsi Terhadap Ekonomi. Diakses pada 29 Juni 2020, dari https://aclc.kpk.go.id/materi/bahaya-dan-dampak-korupsi/infografis/dampak-korupsi-terhadap-ekonomi
Afzali, Mansoor, Gonul Colak, Mengchuan Fu. (2021). Economic Uncertainty and Corruption: Evidence from Public and Privat Firms. Journal of Financial Stability., 57 (2021), 1-21.
Ariawan, I. P., & Umar, H. (2022). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Praktek Anti Korupsi Pada Sustainability Report Terhadap Going Concern Dengan Composite Gcg SpsPerbanas.Ac.Id.http://www.spsperbanas.ac.id/jrpma/index.php/jrpma/article/download/126/59
Barkemeyer, R., Preuss, L., & Lee, L. (2015). Corporate reporting on corruption: An international comparison. Accounting Forum, 39(4), 349–365
Cahaya, F. R., Porter, S., Tower, G., & Brown, A. (2017). Coercive pressures on occupational health and safety disclosures. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 7(3), 318–336.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of accounting and economics, 3(3), 183-199.
Hartomo, O. D. (2019). Anteseden Pengungkapan Kebijakan Anti Korupsi Perusahaan di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 3(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.v3i2.2919
Healy, P. M., & Serafeim, G. (2016). An analysis of firms’ self-reported anticorruption efforts. Accounting Review, 91(2), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51191
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance. (2006). Pedoman Umum Good Corporate Governance Indonesia. Pedoman Umum Good Corporate Governance Indonesia, 30. Diakses dari http://www.gmfaeroasia.co.id/wp-content/uploads/bsk-pdf-manager/42_PEDOMAN_GCG_INDONESIA_2006.PDF
Kong, Dongmin, Yijia Shu, Yanan Wang (2021). Corruption and Corruption Social Responsibility: Evidence from Quasi-Naturak Experiment in China. Journal of Asian Economics, 75 (2021), 1-16.
Malau, M. (2017). Analisis Tata Kelola, Jaminan Eksternal, Karakteristik Perusahaan Dan Kebangkrutan Terhadap Laporan Keberlanjutan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Fundamental Management Journal, 2(2), 47-55.
Masud, Md. Abdul Kaium, Mahfuzur Rahman, Md. Harun Ur Rashid (2022). Anti-Corruption Disclosure, Corporate Social Expenditure and Political Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh. Sustainalibity Journal, 14, 6140, 1-20.
Mulyono, H. A. D., & Raharja, S. (2023). Determinan Pengungkapan Kebijakan Anti Korupsi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 33(2), 515. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2023.v33.i02.p16
Nasir, A., Ilham, E., & Utara, V. I. (2014). Pengaruh Karakteristik Perusahaan Dan Corporate Governance Terhadap Pengungkapan Sustainability Report Pada Perusahaan Lq45 Yang Terdaftar. Jurnal Ekonomi, 22, 1–18. Diakses dari https://ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/JE/article/view/2053
Nobanee, Haitham. (2020). Does Anti-Corruption Disclosure Affect Banking Performance? Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald Publishing Limited.
Sari, T. K., Cahaya, F. R., & Joseph, C. (2020). Coercive Pressures and Anti-corruption Reporting: The Case of ASEAN Countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-17.
Supriyanto, T. L. P. (2019). Pengaruh Praktik Good Corporate Governance, Tingkat Kepemilikan Pemerintah Dan Kekuatan Dewan Direksi Terhadap Pelaporan Anti Korupsi Pada Bumn Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia).
Tirtasari, O. D. H. (2019). Pengaruh GCG Dan Karakteristik Perusahaan Terhadap Kecenderungan Mengungkapkan Kebijakan Anti Korupsi. Αγαη, 8(5), 55.
Transparency.org. (2022). Corruption Perceptions Index 2022. Diakses pada 2 Februari 2023, dari https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/indonesia
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Zhao, Renjie, Jie Chen, Chen Feng, Shihu Zhong. The Impact of Anti-Corruption Measures on Land Supply and the Associated Implications: The Case of China. Land Use Policy, 95 (2020).
Copyright (c) 2023 Stefani Lily Indarto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).













